AOC C27G4H2 vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
AOC C27G4H2
27″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSAOC C27G4H2 and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: AOC C27G4H2 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: AOC C27G4H2 leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
AOC C27G4H2
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC C27G4H2 | Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 200 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | IPS |
| 1 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $350 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC C27G4H2 or Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 better?
AOC C27G4H2 and Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: AOC C27G4H2 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: AOC C27G4H2 leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC C27G4H2 leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).