AOC E960SRDA vs Philips 278C4QHSN
AOC E960SRDA
19″ · 1280×1024 · 60 Hz · TNPhilips 278C4QHSN
27″ · 1920×1080 · 60 HzAOC E960SRDA and Philips 278C4QHSN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 32 and 32.
- Resolution: Philips 278C4QHSN leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024).
- Response time: AOC E960SRDA leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).
AOC E960SRDA
If you care most about response time.
Philips 278C4QHSN
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC E960SRDA | Philips 278C4QHSN | |
|---|---|---|
| 32 | Gear score | 32 |
| 19″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 1280×1024 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| TN | Panel | — |
| 5 ms | Response time | 7 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC E960SRDA or Philips 278C4QHSN better?
AOC E960SRDA and Philips 278C4QHSN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 32 and 32. Resolution: Philips 278C4QHSN leads (1920×1080 vs 1280×1024). Response time: AOC E960SRDA leads (5 ms vs 7 ms).