AOC Q2577PWQ vs Samsung U32D970Q
AOC Q2577PWQ
25″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPSSamsung U32D970Q
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · PLSAOC Q2577PWQ and Samsung U32D970Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51.
- Resolution: Samsung U32D970Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Response time: AOC Q2577PWQ leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
AOC Q2577PWQ
If you care most about response time.
Samsung U32D970Q
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q2577PWQ | Samsung U32D970Q | |
|---|---|---|
| 51 | Gear score | 51 |
| 25″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | PLS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q2577PWQ or Samsung U32D970Q better?
AOC Q2577PWQ and Samsung U32D970Q are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 51 and 51. Resolution: Samsung U32D970Q leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Response time: AOC Q2577PWQ leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).