Monitors / Comparison

AOC Q3279VWF vs Crossover 27Q LED-P

Monitor · AOC

AOC Q3279VWF

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 52.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate25
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Crossover

Crossover 27Q LED-P

27″ · 2560×1440 · 60 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 52.0 / 100Average
Refresh rate15
Resolution80
Panel80
Verdict

AOC Q3279VWF and Crossover 27Q LED-P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.

  • Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Pick this

AOC Q3279VWF

If you care most about refresh rate.

Spec-by-spec comparison

AOC Q3279VWFCrossover 27Q LED-P
52Gear score52
31.5″Screen size27″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
75 HzRefresh rate60 Hz
VAPanelIPS
5 msResponse time—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is AOC Q3279VWF or Crossover 27Q LED-P better?

AOC Q3279VWF and Crossover 27Q LED-P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).

Similar comparisons

AOC Q3279VWF vs MSI PRO MP223 E2AOC Q3279VWF vs MSI PRO MP225VAOC Q3279VWF vs MSI Pro MP2412AOC Q3279VWF vs BenQ SW242QAOC Q3279VWF vs AOC U3277PWQUCrossover 27Q LED-P vs MSI PRO MP223 E2Crossover 27Q LED-P vs MSI PRO MP225VCrossover 27Q LED-P vs MSI Pro MP2412Crossover 27Q LED-P vs BenQ SW242QCrossover 27Q LED-P vs Samsung FT872