AOC Q3279VWF vs iiyama B2783QSU-B1
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VAiiyama B2783QSU-B1
27″ · 2560×1440 · 70 Hz · TNAOC Q3279VWF and iiyama B2783QSU-B1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 70 Hz).
- Response time: iiyama B2783QSU-B1 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about refresh rate.
iiyama B2783QSU-B1
If you care most about response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | iiyama B2783QSU-B1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 70 Hz |
| VA | Panel | TN |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or iiyama B2783QSU-B1 better?
AOC Q3279VWF and iiyama B2783QSU-B1 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 70 Hz). Response time: iiyama B2783QSU-B1 leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 70 Hz).