AOC Q3279VWF vs KOORUI S01
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VAKOORUI S01
21.4″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · VAAOC Q3279VWF and KOORUI S01 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: AOC Q3279VWF leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: KOORUI S01 leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz).
- Response time: KOORUI S01 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about resolution.
KOORUI S01
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | KOORUI S01 | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 21.4″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 100 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or KOORUI S01 better?
AOC Q3279VWF and KOORUI S01 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: AOC Q3279VWF leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: KOORUI S01 leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz). Response time: KOORUI S01 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: KOORUI S01 leads (100 Hz vs 75 Hz).