AOC Q3279VWF vs Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VASamsung LS34J550WQUXEN
34.1″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · VAAOC Q3279VWF and Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 34.1″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN better?
AOC Q3279VWF and Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Samsung LS34J550WQUXEN leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).