Monitors / Comparison
AOC Q3279VWF vs Samsung S32A60
Monitor · AOC
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VAAverage
Refresh rate25
Resolution80
Panel66
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Samsung
Samsung S32A60
32″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VAAverage
Refresh rate25
Resolution80
Panel66
Verdict
AOC Q3279VWF and Samsung S32A60 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | Samsung S32A60 | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 32″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | — |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $270 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or Samsung S32A60 better?
AOC Q3279VWF and Samsung S32A60 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
Similar comparisons
AOC Q3279VWF vs MSI PRO MP223 E2AOC Q3279VWF vs MSI PRO MP225VAOC Q3279VWF vs MSI Pro MP2412AOC Q3279VWF vs BenQ SW242QAOC Q3279VWF vs AOC U3277PWQUSamsung S32A60 vs MSI PRO MP223 E2Samsung S32A60 vs MSI PRO MP225VSamsung S32A60 vs MSI Pro MP2412Samsung S32A60 vs BenQ SW242QSamsung S32A60 vs Samsung FT872