AOC Q3279VWF vs Samsung S34E790C
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VASamsung S34E790C
34″ · 3440×1440 · 60 Hz · VAAOC Q3279VWF and Samsung S34E790C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Samsung S34E790C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung S34E790C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung S34E790C
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | Samsung S34E790C | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or Samsung S34E790C better?
AOC Q3279VWF and Samsung S34E790C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Samsung S34E790C leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Samsung S34E790C leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).