AOC Q3279VWF vs Samsung T23A950
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VASamsung T23A950
23″ · 1920×1080 · 120 HzAOC Q3279VWF and Samsung T23A950 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: AOC Q3279VWF leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Samsung T23A950 leads (120 Hz vs 75 Hz).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about resolution.
Samsung T23A950
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | Samsung T23A950 | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 23″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| VA | Panel | — |
| 5 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or Samsung T23A950 better?
AOC Q3279VWF and Samsung T23A950 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: AOC Q3279VWF leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Samsung T23A950 leads (120 Hz vs 75 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Samsung T23A950 leads (120 Hz vs 75 Hz).