AOC Q3279VWF vs Samsung UE590
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VASamsung UE590
23.6″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · PLS · 2015AOC Q3279VWF and Samsung UE590 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Samsung UE590 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: Samsung UE590 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about refresh rate.
Samsung UE590
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | Samsung UE590 | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 23.6″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | PLS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Release year | 2015 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or Samsung UE590 better?
AOC Q3279VWF and Samsung UE590 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Samsung UE590 leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: Samsung UE590 leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).