AOC Q3279VWF vs Seiki SM40UNP
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VASeiki SM40UNP
40″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · VAAOC Q3279VWF and Seiki SM40UNP are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: Seiki SM40UNP leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: AOC Q3279VWF leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Seiki SM40UNP
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | Seiki SM40UNP | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 40″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 8 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or Seiki SM40UNP better?
AOC Q3279VWF and Seiki SM40UNP are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: Seiki SM40UNP leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: AOC Q3279VWF leads (5 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).