AOC Q3279VWF vs ViewSonic VX3267U-4K
AOC Q3279VWF
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · VAViewSonic VX3267U-4K
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 HzAOC Q3279VWF and ViewSonic VX3267U-4K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52.
- Resolution: ViewSonic VX3267U-4K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ViewSonic VX3267U-4K leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC Q3279VWF
If you care most about refresh rate.
ViewSonic VX3267U-4K
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC Q3279VWF | ViewSonic VX3267U-4K | |
|---|---|---|
| 52 | Gear score | 52 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 75 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| VA | Panel | — |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $370 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC Q3279VWF or ViewSonic VX3267U-4K better?
AOC Q3279VWF and ViewSonic VX3267U-4K are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 52 and 52. Resolution: ViewSonic VX3267U-4K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ViewSonic VX3267U-4K leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: AOC Q3279VWF leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).