AOC U2477PWQ vs BenQ GW3290QT
AOC U2477PWQ
23.6″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · PLSBenQ GW3290QT
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 75 Hz · IPSAOC U2477PWQ and BenQ GW3290QT are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55.
- Resolution: AOC U2477PWQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: BenQ GW3290QT leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: AOC U2477PWQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
AOC U2477PWQ
If you care most about resolution, response time.
BenQ GW3290QT
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC U2477PWQ | BenQ GW3290QT | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 55 |
| 23.6″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| PLS | Panel | IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $360 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC U2477PWQ or BenQ GW3290QT better?
AOC U2477PWQ and BenQ GW3290QT are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 55. Resolution: AOC U2477PWQ leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: BenQ GW3290QT leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: AOC U2477PWQ leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ GW3290QT leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).