AOC U27B3A vs Philips 49B2U6900CH
AOC U27B3A
27″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · IPSPhilips 49B2U6900CH
48.8″ · 5120×1440 · 75 Hz · VAAOC U27B3A and Philips 49B2U6900CH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58.
- Resolution: AOC U27B3A leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440).
- Refresh rate: Philips 49B2U6900CH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
AOC U27B3A
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 49B2U6900CH
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| AOC U27B3A | Philips 49B2U6900CH | |
|---|---|---|
| 58 | Gear score | 58 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 48.8″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 75 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $1,100 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is AOC U27B3A or Philips 49B2U6900CH better?
AOC U27B3A and Philips 49B2U6900CH are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 58 and 58. Resolution: AOC U27B3A leads (3840×2160 vs 5120×1440). Refresh rate: Philips 49B2U6900CH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 49B2U6900CH leads (75 Hz vs 60 Hz).