ASRock CL25FF vs LG W2363D-PU
ASRock CL25FF
24.5″ · 1920×1080 · 100 Hz · IPSLG W2363D-PU
23″ · 1920×1080 · 120 Hz · TNASRock CL25FF and LG W2363D-PU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 54.
- Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 100 Hz).
- Response time: LG W2363D-PU leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
LG W2363D-PU
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASRock CL25FF | LG W2363D-PU | |
|---|---|---|
| 55 | Gear score | 54 |
| 24.5″ | Screen size | 23″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 100 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 4 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASRock CL25FF or LG W2363D-PU better?
ASRock CL25FF and LG W2363D-PU are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 55 and 54. Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 100 Hz). Response time: LG W2363D-PU leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG W2363D-PU leads (120 Hz vs 100 Hz).