ASRock PG27FF1A vs ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDASRock PG27FF1A and ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: ASRock PG27FF1A leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz).
ASRock PG27FF1A
If you care most about refresh rate.
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASRock PG27FF1A | ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 3840×2160 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 60 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | OLED |
| — | Response time | 0.1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $3,200 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASRock PG27FF1A or ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC better?
ASRock PG27FF1A and ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: ASRock PG27FF1A leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASRock PG27FF1A leads (165 Hz vs 60 Hz).