ASUS MG279Q vs KTC H32S17
ASUS MG279Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSKTC H32S17
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS MG279Q and KTC H32S17 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Refresh rate: KTC H32S17 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: KTC H32S17 leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
KTC H32S17
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MG279Q | KTC H32S17 | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $236 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MG279Q or KTC H32S17 better?
ASUS MG279Q and KTC H32S17 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Refresh rate: KTC H32S17 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: KTC H32S17 leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: KTC H32S17 leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).