ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K vs KTC H32S17
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSKTC H32S17
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and KTC H32S17 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: KTC H32S17 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: KTC H32S17 leads (3 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
KTC H32S17
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | KTC H32S17 | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 31.5″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
| ≈ $2,700 | Estimated price | ≈ $236 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K or KTC H32S17 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and KTC H32S17 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: KTC H32S17 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: KTC H32S17 leads (3 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: KTC H32S17 leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K ≈ $2,700, KTC H32S17 ≈ $236. Current prices vary by store.