ASUS MG279Q vs Philips 24M2N3200A
ASUS MG279Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSPhilips 24M2N3200A
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · Fast IPSASUS MG279Q and Philips 24M2N3200A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS MG279Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 24M2N3200A leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 24M2N3200A leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS MG279Q
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 24M2N3200A
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MG279Q | Philips 24M2N3200A | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MG279Q or Philips 24M2N3200A better?
ASUS MG279Q and Philips 24M2N3200A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS MG279Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 24M2N3200A leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Philips 24M2N3200A leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 24M2N3200A leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).