ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K vs Philips 24M2N3200A
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSPhilips 24M2N3200A
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · Fast IPSASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and Philips 24M2N3200A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 24M2N3200A leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 24M2N3200A leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 24M2N3200A
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | Philips 24M2N3200A | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $2,700 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K or Philips 24M2N3200A better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and Philips 24M2N3200A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 24M2N3200A leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Philips 24M2N3200A leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 24M2N3200A leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).