ASUS MG279Q vs Philips 27M2N3201A
ASUS MG279Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSPhilips 27M2N3201A
27″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · Fast IPSASUS MG279Q and Philips 27M2N3201A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS MG279Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201A leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 27M2N3201A leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS MG279Q
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 27M2N3201A
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MG279Q | Philips 27M2N3201A | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast IPS |
| 4 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MG279Q or Philips 27M2N3201A better?
ASUS MG279Q and Philips 27M2N3201A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS MG279Q leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201A leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: Philips 27M2N3201A leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201A leads (180 Hz vs 144 Hz).