ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K vs Philips 27M2N3201A
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSPhilips 27M2N3201A
27″ · 1920×1080 · 180 Hz · Fast IPSASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and Philips 27M2N3201A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201A leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Philips 27M2N3201A leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
Philips 27M2N3201A
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | Philips 27M2N3201A | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Fast IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $2,700 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K or Philips 27M2N3201A better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and Philips 27M2N3201A are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201A leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Philips 27M2N3201A leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Philips 27M2N3201A leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).