ASUS MG279Q vs ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC
ASUS MG279Q
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSViewSonic ELITE XG270QC
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS MG279Q and ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Refresh rate: ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS MG279Q | ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 4 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS MG279Q or ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC better?
ASUS MG279Q and ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Refresh rate: ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC leads (3 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC leads (165 Hz vs 144 Hz).