ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K vs ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
32″ · 3840×2160 · 120 Hz · IPSViewSonic ELITE XG270QC
27″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC leads (3 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K
If you care most about resolution.
ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K | ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC | |
|---|---|---|
| 71 | Gear score | 71 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 3 ms |
| ≈ $2,700 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K or ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K and ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 71 and 71. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32UCG-K leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC leads (3 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ViewSonic ELITE XG270QC leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).