ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs MSI G244F
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSMSI G244F
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 170 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and MSI G244F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI G244F leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).
- Response time: MSI G244F leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
If you care most about resolution.
MSI G244F
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV | MSI G244F | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 170 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $359 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV or MSI G244F better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and MSI G244F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI G244F leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz). Response time: MSI G244F leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI G244F leads (170 Hz vs 144 Hz).