Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs MSI G244F
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSMSI G244F
23.8″ · 1920×1080 · 170 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and MSI G244F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI G244F leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: MSI G244F leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
MSI G244F
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | MSI G244F | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 23.8″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 170 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 8 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or MSI G244F better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and MSI G244F are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI G244F leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: MSI G244F leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI G244F leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).