Monitors / Comparison
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs Xiaomi Mi
Monitor · ASUS
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · IPSVery good
Refresh rate62
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · Xiaomi
Xiaomi Mi
34″ · 3440×1440 · 144 Hz · VAVery good
Refresh rate62
Resolution88
Panel66
Response time60
Verdict
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and Xiaomi Mi are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Xiaomi Mi leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Response time: Xiaomi Mi leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Pick this
Xiaomi Mi
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV | Xiaomi Mi | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $359 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Free · no install
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV or Xiaomi Mi better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV and Xiaomi Mi are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Xiaomi Mi leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Response time: Xiaomi Mi leads (4 ms vs 5 ms).
Similar comparisons
ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs ASUS ROG Strix XG248QASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs ASUS ROG Strix XG258QASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165ASUS ProArt Display PA278CGV vs BenQ EX2780QXiaomi Mi vs Corsair XENEON 315QHD165Xiaomi Mi vs ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGVXiaomi Mi vs ASUS ROG Strix XG248QXiaomi Mi vs BenQ EX2780Q