ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs Xiaomi Mi
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSXiaomi Mi
34″ · 3440×1440 · 144 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Xiaomi Mi are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Refresh rate: Xiaomi Mi leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about response time.
Xiaomi Mi
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | Xiaomi Mi | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or Xiaomi Mi better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Xiaomi Mi are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Refresh rate: Xiaomi Mi leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Xiaomi Mi leads (144 Hz vs 120 Hz).