ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV vs Cooler Master GP57ZS
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSCooler Master GP57ZS
57″ · 7680×2160 · 120 Hz · Mini LED VAASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and Cooler Master GP57ZS are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: Cooler Master GP57ZS leads (7680×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Cooler Master GP57ZS leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
If you care most about refresh rate.
Cooler Master GP57ZS
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV | Cooler Master GP57ZS | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 57″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 7680×2160 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | Mini LED VA |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $550 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV or Cooler Master GP57ZS better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and Cooler Master GP57ZS are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: Cooler Master GP57ZS leads (7680×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Cooler Master GP57ZS leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).