ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV vs LG 34GK950G-B
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSLG 34GK950G-B
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and LG 34GK950G-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.
- Resolution: LG 34GK950G-B leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: LG 34GK950G-B leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV
If you care most about refresh rate.
LG 34GK950G-B
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV | LG 34GK950G-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | Gear score | 72 |
| 32″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 5 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $550 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV or LG 34GK950G-B better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and LG 34GK950G-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Resolution: LG 34GK950G-B leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: LG 34GK950G-B leads (1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV leads (165 Hz vs 120 Hz).