Monitors / Comparison

ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV vs MSI G32CQ5P

Monitor · ASUS

ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV

32″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPS
GEAR SCORE 72.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate68
Resolution80
Panel80
Response time50
VS
Monitor · MSI

MSI G32CQ5P

31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 170 Hz · VA
GEAR SCORE 72.0 / 100Very good
Refresh rate69
Resolution80
Panel66
Verdict

ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and MSI G32CQ5P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72.

  • Refresh rate: MSI G32CQ5P leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Pick this

MSI G32CQ5P

If you care most about refresh rate.

Spec-by-spec comparison

ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGVMSI G32CQ5P
72Gear score72
32″Screen size31.5″
2560×1440Resolution2560×1440
165 HzRefresh rate170 Hz
IPSPanelVA
5 msResponse time—
≈ $550Estimated price—

The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.

Free · no install

Which one adds more to your setup?

The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.

Scan my PCSee the leaderboard →

FAQ

Is ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV or MSI G32CQ5P better?

ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV and MSI G32CQ5P are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 72 and 72. Refresh rate: MSI G32CQ5P leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).

Which has the higher refresh rate?

Refresh rate: MSI G32CQ5P leads (170 Hz vs 165 Hz).

Similar comparisons

ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV vs ASUS ROG Strix XG32VCASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG258QMASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV vs ASUS TUF Gaming VG27AQA1AASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV vs MSI G271CQP E2ASUS ProArt Display PA328CGV vs MSI G273CQMSI G32CQ5P vs MSI G271CQP E2MSI G32CQ5P vs MSI G273CQMSI G32CQ5P vs MSI G27CQ4 E2MSI G32CQ5P vs ASUS ROG Strix XG32VC