ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC vs Gigabyte G27F 2
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDGigabyte G27F 2
27″ · 1920×1080 · 170 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and Gigabyte G27F 2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte G27F 2 leads (170 Hz vs 60 Hz).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
If you care most about resolution.
Gigabyte G27F 2
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC | Gigabyte G27F 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 170 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | IPS |
| 0.1 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $3,200 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC or Gigabyte G27F 2 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and Gigabyte G27F 2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Gigabyte G27F 2 leads (170 Hz vs 60 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte G27F 2 leads (170 Hz vs 60 Hz).