ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC vs LG 34GK950G
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDLG 34GK950G
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and LG 34GK950G are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440).
- Refresh rate: LG 34GK950G leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (0.1 ms vs 5 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
If you care most about resolution, response time.
LG 34GK950G
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC | LG 34GK950G | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 34″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 3440×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 120 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | IPS |
| 0.1 ms | Response time | 5 ms |
| ≈ $3,200 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC or LG 34GK950G better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and LG 34GK950G are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 3440×1440). Refresh rate: LG 34GK950G leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (0.1 ms vs 5 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 34GK950G leads (120 Hz vs 60 Hz).