ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC vs MSI G27C6P E2
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDMSI G27C6P E2
27″ · 1920×1080 · 170 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and MSI G27C6P E2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI G27C6P E2 leads (170 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
If you care most about resolution, response time.
MSI G27C6P E2
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC | MSI G27C6P E2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 170 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | VA |
| 0.1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $3,200 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC or MSI G27C6P E2 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and MSI G27C6P E2 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI G27C6P E2 leads (170 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI G27C6P E2 leads (170 Hz vs 60 Hz).