ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC vs Pixio PX276
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
31.5″ · 3840×2160 · 60 Hz · OLEDPixio PX276
27″ · 2560×1440 · 144 Hz · TNASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and Pixio PX276 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: Pixio PX276 leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC
If you care most about resolution, response time.
Pixio PX276
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC | Pixio PX276 | |
|---|---|---|
| 67 | Gear score | 67 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3840×2160 | Resolution | 2560×1440 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh rate | 144 Hz |
| OLED | Panel | TN |
| 0.1 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $3,200 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC or Pixio PX276 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC and Pixio PX276 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 67 and 67. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (3840×2160 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: Pixio PX276 leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA32DC leads (0.1 ms vs 1 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Pixio PX276 leads (144 Hz vs 60 Hz).