ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs GamePower Vivid T40
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSGamePower Vivid T40
24″ · 1920×1080 · 180 HzASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and GamePower Vivid T40 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: GamePower Vivid T40 leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: GamePower Vivid T40 leads (0.5 ms vs 2 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution.
GamePower Vivid T40
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | GamePower Vivid T40 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | — |
| 2 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or GamePower Vivid T40 better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and GamePower Vivid T40 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: GamePower Vivid T40 leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: GamePower Vivid T40 leads (0.5 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: GamePower Vivid T40 leads (180 Hz vs 120 Hz).