Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs GamePower Vivid T40
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSGamePower Vivid T40
24″ · 1920×1080 · 180 HzCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and GamePower Vivid T40 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: GamePower Vivid T40 leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: GamePower Vivid T40 leads (0.5 ms vs 8 ms).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
GamePower Vivid T40
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | GamePower Vivid T40 | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 180 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | — |
| 8 ms | Response time | 0.5 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or GamePower Vivid T40 better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and GamePower Vivid T40 are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: GamePower Vivid T40 leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: GamePower Vivid T40 leads (0.5 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: GamePower Vivid T40 leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).