ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs Gigabyte GS27FA
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSGigabyte GS27FA
27″ · 1920×1080 · 190 Hz · IPSASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Gigabyte GS27FA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte GS27FA leads (190 Hz vs 120 Hz).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution.
Gigabyte GS27FA
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | Gigabyte GS27FA | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 190 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 2 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or Gigabyte GS27FA better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Gigabyte GS27FA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Gigabyte GS27FA leads (190 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte GS27FA leads (190 Hz vs 120 Hz).