Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs Gigabyte GS27FA
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSGigabyte GS27FA
27″ · 1920×1080 · 190 Hz · IPSCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Gigabyte GS27FA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Gigabyte GS27FA leads (190 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
Gigabyte GS27FA
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | Gigabyte GS27FA | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 190 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | IPS |
| 8 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or Gigabyte GS27FA better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Gigabyte GS27FA are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Gigabyte GS27FA leads (190 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Gigabyte GS27FA leads (190 Hz vs 165 Hz).