ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs LG 27GK750F-B
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSLG 27GK750F-B
27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and LG 27GK750F-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG 27GK750F-B leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: LG 27GK750F-B leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution.
LG 27GK750F-B
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | LG 27GK750F-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or LG 27GK750F-B better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and LG 27GK750F-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG 27GK750F-B leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: LG 27GK750F-B leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 27GK750F-B leads (240 Hz vs 120 Hz).