Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs LG 27GK750F-B
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSLG 27GK750F-B
27″ · 1920×1080 · 240 Hz · TNCorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and LG 27GK750F-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: LG 27GK750F-B leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: LG 27GK750F-B leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
LG 27GK750F-B
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | LG 27GK750F-B | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 240 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | TN |
| 8 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or LG 27GK750F-B better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and LG 27GK750F-B are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: LG 27GK750F-B leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: LG 27GK750F-B leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: LG 27GK750F-B leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).