ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs MSI MAG27C6X
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSMSI MAG27C6X
27″ · 1920×1080 · 250 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and MSI MAG27C6X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG27C6X leads (250 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution, response time.
MSI MAG27C6X
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | MSI MAG27C6X | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 250 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $170 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or MSI MAG27C6X better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and MSI MAG27C6X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG27C6X leads (250 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (2 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG27C6X leads (250 Hz vs 120 Hz).