Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs MSI MAG27C6X
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSMSI MAG27C6X
27″ · 1920×1080 · 250 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and MSI MAG27C6X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: MSI MAG27C6X leads (250 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: MSI MAG27C6X leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
MSI MAG27C6X
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | MSI MAG27C6X | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 27″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 250 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 8 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | ≈ $170 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or MSI MAG27C6X better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and MSI MAG27C6X are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: MSI MAG27C6X leads (250 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: MSI MAG27C6X leads (4 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: MSI MAG27C6X leads (250 Hz vs 165 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 ≈ $350, MSI MAG27C6X ≈ $170. Current prices vary by store.