ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs Pixio PXC248 Wave
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSPixio PXC248 Wave
24″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Pixio PXC248 Wave are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Pixio PXC248 Wave leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz).
- Response time: Pixio PXC248 Wave leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution.
Pixio PXC248 Wave
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | Pixio PXC248 Wave | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| — | Estimated price | ≈ $150 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or Pixio PXC248 Wave better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Pixio PXC248 Wave are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Pixio PXC248 Wave leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz). Response time: Pixio PXC248 Wave leads (1 ms vs 2 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Pixio PXC248 Wave leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz).