Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs Pixio PXC248 Wave
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSPixio PXC248 Wave
24″ · 1920×1080 · 200 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Pixio PXC248 Wave are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: Pixio PXC248 Wave leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: Pixio PXC248 Wave leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
Pixio PXC248 Wave
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | Pixio PXC248 Wave | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 24″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 1920×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 8 ms | Response time | 1 ms |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | ≈ $150 |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or Pixio PXC248 Wave better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Pixio PXC248 Wave are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: Pixio PXC248 Wave leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: Pixio PXC248 Wave leads (1 ms vs 8 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Pixio PXC248 Wave leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
How much do they cost?
Estimated prices: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 ≈ $350, Pixio PXC248 Wave ≈ $150. Current prices vary by store.