ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV vs Rampage Raiden RA30R200C
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
34″ · 3440×1440 · 120 Hz · IPSRampage Raiden RA30R200C
30″ · 2560×1080 · 200 Hz · VAASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Rampage Raiden RA30R200C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: Rampage Raiden RA30R200C leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz).
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV
If you care most about resolution.
Rampage Raiden RA30R200C
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV | Rampage Raiden RA30R200C | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 34″ | Screen size | 30″ |
| 3440×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 2 ms | Response time | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV or Rampage Raiden RA30R200C better?
ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV and Rampage Raiden RA30R200C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: ASUS ProArt Display PA348CGV leads (3440×1440 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: Rampage Raiden RA30R200C leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Rampage Raiden RA30R200C leads (200 Hz vs 120 Hz).