Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 vs Rampage Raiden RA30R200C
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
31.5″ · 2560×1440 · 165 Hz · IPSRampage Raiden RA30R200C
30″ · 2560×1080 · 200 Hz · VACorsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Rampage Raiden RA30R200C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70.
- Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080).
- Refresh rate: Rampage Raiden RA30R200C leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165
If you care most about resolution.
Rampage Raiden RA30R200C
If you care most about refresh rate.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 | Rampage Raiden RA30R200C | |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | Gear score | 70 |
| 31.5″ | Screen size | 30″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 2560×1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh rate | 200 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| 8 ms | Response time | — |
| ≈ $350 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 or Rampage Raiden RA30R200C better?
Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 and Rampage Raiden RA30R200C are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 70 and 70. Resolution: Corsair XENEON 315QHD165 leads (2560×1440 vs 2560×1080). Refresh rate: Rampage Raiden RA30R200C leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: Rampage Raiden RA30R200C leads (200 Hz vs 165 Hz).