ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS vs Philips 498P9Z
ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS
27″ · 2560×1440 · 180 Hz · VAPhilips 498P9Z
48.8″ · 5120×1440 · 165 Hz · VAASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS and Philips 498P9Z are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.
- Resolution: Philips 498P9Z leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440).
- Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).
- Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS
If you care most about refresh rate, response time.
Philips 498P9Z
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS | Philips 498P9Z | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 75 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 48.8″ |
| 2560×1440 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 180 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| VA | Panel | VA |
| 1 ms | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $278 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS or Philips 498P9Z better?
ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS and Philips 498P9Z are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75. Resolution: Philips 498P9Z leads (5120×1440 vs 2560×1440). Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz). Response time: ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS leads (1 ms vs 4 ms).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: ASUS ROG Strix XG27WCS leads (180 Hz vs 165 Hz).