BenQ EX270M vs Philips 498P9Z
Philips 498P9Z
48.8″ · 5120×1440 · 165 Hz · VABenQ EX270M and Philips 498P9Z are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75.
- Resolution: Philips 498P9Z leads (5120×1440 vs 1920×1080).
- Refresh rate: BenQ EX270M leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
BenQ EX270M
If you care most about refresh rate.
Philips 498P9Z
If you care most about resolution.
Spec-by-spec comparison
| BenQ EX270M | Philips 498P9Z | |
|---|---|---|
| 75 | Gear score | 75 |
| 27″ | Screen size | 48.8″ |
| 1920×1080 | Resolution | 5120×1440 |
| 240 Hz | Refresh rate | 165 Hz |
| IPS | Panel | VA |
| — | Response time | 4 ms |
| ≈ $280 | Estimated price | — |
The gear score is computed from specifications only (e.g. for a mouse: weight, sensor, polling rate, connection and release year). It isn’t a lab test and doesn’t measure personal preferences like shape or grip.
Which one adds more to your setup?
The scanner finds your graphics card, CPU, RAM, monitor, mouse and keyboard in under a minute. You get a score out of 100, estimated FPS in games, a bottleneck check and upgrade tips made for you.
FAQ
Is BenQ EX270M or Philips 498P9Z better?
BenQ EX270M and Philips 498P9Z are neck and neck on specs: gear scores 75 and 75. Resolution: Philips 498P9Z leads (5120×1440 vs 1920×1080). Refresh rate: BenQ EX270M leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).
Which has the higher refresh rate?
Refresh rate: BenQ EX270M leads (240 Hz vs 165 Hz).